Last week, researchers refreshed the debate on whether dogs can feel ‘human’ emotions, with news about an experiment with food bowls that might suggest optimistic or pessimistic attitudes among the dogs that took part. Anything that can help us to understand our dogs’ behaviour, especially if that behaviour is caused by anxiety or stress, must be a good thing. But I’m not sure measuring dogs against a human yardstick is the answer.
Since dogs tend to live closely with their owners in a domestic setting, we have many opportunities to relate to their emotional state, and like most dog owners I’m sure my dogs lead an emotionally rich life. Our dogs don’t share our language, so a lot of their emotional and thought processes are a mystery to us. The popularity of ‘dog whisperers’ like Cesar Millan, who seem to understand the language of dogs better than most of us, is testament to that mystery and our urge to unravel it. But does that mean we’re witnessing ‘human’ emotions in our dogs?
By suggesting that dogs might be optimistic or pessimistic, the research draws attention to the vast and subtle range of possible motivations for dog behaviour. In the experiment described, a food bowl was placed at ambiguous points between ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ locations, where the dogs had grown used to seeing two other bowls – one containing food, the other empty. The ‘optimistic’ dogs ran to the ‘ambiguous’ bowl in search of food, while the ‘pessimistic’ ones didn’t.
I’m sure those dogs had their reasons, but I’m not sure the experiment proves that an optimistic or pessimistic outlook was the cause. If a dog didn’t look for food in the new bowl, perhaps it was confident that food would appear in the ‘positive’ location and saw no need to investigate. I also know from experience that some dogs are anxious about unfamiliar objects, and this might affect their inclination to explore a bowl in an unfamiliar place. Without being a part of the trial, I don’t know for sure what conditions it was conducted in, but surely it’s also possible that, with a highly developed sense of smell, some dogs already knew whether the bowl was worth investigating, even from a distance.
When Charlie was quadriplegic the vet warned me that, in order to recover, he had to ‘want’ to walk again. Whippets are very adaptable dogs, and one of the concerns was that, as such, he might accept a level of disability and get on with it as best he could – but if he had accepted a life of reduced mobility, would that make him pessimistic? Or would that level of acceptance and ‘getting on with it’ make him an optimist? I just don’t think it’s that easy to attribute optimism or pessimism to levels of acceptance.
This is not to say that dogs can’t be optimistic or pessimistic, as well as feeling a huge range of other emotions. I think that, over thousands of years of canine domestication, there’s been a long-running cultural exchange between humans and dogs – how else would we be able to communicate as well as we do? But as this study makes clear, there are gaps in that communication.
It would be arrogant to assume that dogs don’t feel any of the emotions we feel, but there’s also arrogance in the assumption that canine emotions must mirror those of humans. Perhaps the root of the riddle lies in the fact that, as humans, we only have our human emotions to refer to in our relationships with animals – it’s an imperfect measure, but it’s all we’ve got.